S47 initiated after false allegations

[Fatherof480]

Hi there,

On 28th October, SS turned up at our door with 2 police officers (1 a trainee) in regards to comments made by our disabled twin daughters whilst in school, I will name them as Twin F and Twin L.

Twin F stated "she got slapped" during a lesson about abuse and claimed it happened 2 days prior to her claim. Twin L claimed she was inappropriately touched by her uncle.

When the twins were interviewed In our home, Twin F changed her story claiming it was "2-3 months ago or something like that" but couldn't name who did it or where it happened. Twin F refused blindly that she had never said that and wanted to call her teacher a liar.

SW told us that another SW would be out to question our youngest 2 daughters within 48 hours but they still havent come out to see them. I spoke to the SW 3 days later, asking if she could find out when Twin L had made this claim and she said she would get right on it but no response as yet.
Next day, Twin F told us she went into school and changed her story again saying it was 2-3 years ago she got slapped. 26 days later, we've not heard a thing about the investigation.

Now, Twin F has had a bad reputation of making false allegations against me and my wife and also against former teachers and their former PA which were all quashed as she always changes her story and its been put down to attention seeking. Twin L on the other hand, has never been like this and it is a first, yet she is still adamant that she never said anything like this.

We still havent heard anything from SS and it dumfounds me that if there was anything to these allegations, then they wouldn't be leaving it this long to finalise, let alone the risks our children were potentially facing if the allegations were true. Also as the 15 working days period has passed for an ICPC, surely they must have some doubt of these allegations aswell.

We are also questioning the reliability of their school as it has come under a lot of scrutiny within the last 12 months as OFSTED reports have gone from outstanding to requires improvement and it has been noted that there are at least 2 teachers/TA's who have been found guilty of physical abuse to students recently.

Another reason I am questioning the school is that I received an email from Twin F's teacher stating that Twin F was touched on her bottom by another student during a music lesson, early last week. When I questioned Twin F, she said she wasn't as she doesn't have music lessons and that it was infact Twin L who was touched on her bottom by another student during her music lesson. This leads me to believe that maybe the accusation that was made by Twin L initially was actually made by Twin F and they've gotten the wrong child?

What should be our next steps be please?

[Winter25]

Hi Fatherof480,

I’m really glad you’ve posted, because what you are describing is one of the most common and frightening situations parents face when a Section 47 is triggered based on unclear or inconsistent school disclosures. You are not alone in this , and the long silence from social services is actually a strong sign that they do not believe there is immediate safeguarding risk.

Let me break down what is happening and what you can do next.

1. The inconsistent disclosures matter more than you think

Twin F has changed her story:

2 days ago

then 2–3 months ago

then 2–3 years ago

then denied ever saying it at all

This pattern tells professionals the allegation is not reliable evidence of harm.

The fact she called the teacher a liar is also significant in terms of credibility.

You mentioned she has a history of false allegations due to attention-seeking, social workers will already know this and will factor it in.

Twin L denies the allegation made in her name.
That is also important.

Professionals do not treat inconsistent historic allegations (with no named perpetrator and no location) as evidence of abuse.

2. If they truly believed the children were unsafe, you would NOT be hearing silence

When an allegation is believed to be credible, the timeline is:

Same-day visit

Strategy meeting within 24 hours
Section 47 enquiries begin immediately
ICPC within 15 working days
Full investigation written
Safety plan in place

You are past the ICPC window with:
no follow-up
no interviews
no meetings
no concerns raised
no interim safety plan

The lack of action means they do not believe these disclosures amount to significant harm.

3. You are right to question the school’s reliability

If the school ,mixed up which twin was touched or

communicated poorly
confused incidents
has teachers recently found guilty of abusing students
is under scrutiny from Ofsted

…then the possibility of misreporting or misinterpreting a disclosure is absolutely real.

Schools sometimes report allegations incorrectly, especially when children have disabilities or communication differences.

4. Your next steps (the ones that actually protect your family)
A. Email the social worker and manager , short, factual, in writing

You simply ask for the below ( change the parts inside the brackets)
-----------
Subject: Request for Update and Clarification – Section 47 Enquiry re [Children’s Names]

Dear [Social Worker’s Name] and [Team Manager’s Name],

I am writing regarding the Section 47 enquiry that was initiated on 28 October in relation to my daughters, [Twin F] and [Twin L].

On that date, you attended our home with two police officers and informed us that:

[Twin F] had reported being “slapped”; and

[Twin L] had reported inappropriate touching by an uncle.

You also advised that another social worker would visit within 48 hours to speak with our younger daughters. That visit has not yet taken place, and we have received no further update on the investigation.

Since then, there have been significant inconsistencies in the information we have been told:

[Twin F] has changed her account several times (two days ago, 2–3 months ago, 2–3 years ago) and has been unable to say who allegedly hurt her or where.

[Twin L] remains clear that she did not make the allegation attributed to her.

Given that more than 15 working days have now passed since the Section 47 started, I would be grateful if you could please:

Confirm whether the Section 47 enquiry is still ongoing or has been concluded.

If it has been concluded, confirm the outcome in writing.

Clarify, in summary, what disclosures were actually recorded from each child and on what date.

Confirm whether a Child Protection Conference has been held or will be held, and if not, why not.

As parents, we are fully committed to safeguarding our children and to cooperating with any reasonable enquiries. At the same time, we need clear written information about the status and outcome of this investigation so that we can understand what, if anything, is required of us going forward.

I would be grateful for a response within 10 working days.

Kind regards,
----


Keep all communication in writing going forward

No calls.
No verbal updates.
Everything written becomes evidence.

D. Document every inconsistency in a calm timeline

This will help if the case drags on.

5. What not to do
Don’t confront the school emotionally
Don’t speculate about staff guilt
Don’t accuse professionals
Don’t chase SS aggressively (it can backfire)

Your strength right now is the LA’s silence , which tells you the case is not escalating.

Nothing in your description resembles a case where parents are removed from children.

This looks like more like inconsistent disclosures, communication errors, a cautious school and an LA carrying out the bare minimum of checks and now letting the case drift because it’s not supported by evidence.

You are not in danger here.
You are in a paperwork limbo.
----------
For full transparency, I am not an official adviser for this forum. I am a parent who has been through a long and successful legal battle with a local authority, and I share guidance based on lived experience. It is up to each parent to decide what is right for their situation.