Search found 5 matches

by Wolfzone
Tue Oct 27, 2020 3:47 pm
Forum: 26 week care proceedings timescale
Topic: Help they are looking at adoption my baby
Replies: 2
Views: 3008

Re: Help they are looking at adoption my baby

Can you please post up the full details of this matter.

What is the "old history"?

Kind regards

Wolfzone
by Wolfzone
Wed Oct 21, 2020 6:40 pm
Forum: Are social workers worried about domestic violence in your family?
Topic: HELP- Social services mystery!
Replies: 3
Views: 3127

Re: HELP- Social services mystery!

The social workers, the county council do not have any authority to stop you from seeing your children, only the court has the power and authority to stop/terminate contact, and such an order can only be made where real evidence is put before the court establishing that your children will be put at ...
by Wolfzone
Wed Oct 21, 2020 6:22 pm
Forum: General/Archive
Topic: Help
Replies: 2
Views: 2042

Re: Help

What are the terms of any order or agreement as to your child having contact with her dad? What grounds does the county council rely upon to bring the care proceedings? As the interim care order (ICO) was not granted, this is a good sign for your child and you. What stage are the proceedings at? You...
by Wolfzone
Wed Oct 21, 2020 6:14 pm
Forum: Are social workers worried about your child?
Topic: CPO in place for fathers not guilty past,
Replies: 4
Views: 3360

Re: CPO in place for fathers not guilty past,

I would just like to clarify the law on the point, in case my first post here has caused any confusion. So, as regards the first incident 6 years ago, your partner was acquitted on the allegation/charge and therefore he can not be prosecuted or harassed on that same question again in any court withi...
by Wolfzone
Sat Oct 17, 2020 5:10 pm
Forum: Are social workers worried about your child?
Topic: CPO in place for fathers not guilty past,
Replies: 4
Views: 3360

Re: CPO in place for fathers not guilty past,

Autrefois acquit - the law Darling J. in Reg. v. Ollis [1900] 2 Q.B. 78 at p. 780 where he said: "I feel sure that [the words 'bis vexatus'] are not to be understood as meaning that a man is not to be more than once annoyed by the same evidence. I think they mean that he is not to be by legal p...