Guardian report

Post Reply
youngagain
Posts: 172
Joined: Fri Jan 08, 2010 2:50 pm

Guardian report

Post by youngagain » Tue Dec 07, 2010 8:22 pm

We received the guardians report today regarding the frequency and level of supervision she recommends. She says 2 hours a month with little ones dad with his mum supervising. Sounds good to me on the face of it but that would be the same mum who was supposed to supervise when his assessment was being done by the L.A.which led to twelve separate incidents where she was not supervising and little one taken to the doctors on an emergency basis etc. The guardian and the L.A. neglected to even raise these issues at all ever.? Hmm I thought the guardian was appointed to oversee the interests of the child, how I wonder did she miss this.

youngagain
Posts: 172
Joined: Fri Jan 08, 2010 2:50 pm

Re: Guardian report

Post by youngagain » Wed Dec 08, 2010 5:50 pm

Thanks for you views, I will put this forward,its the welfare of the child that should be considered above all else.

gb2010
Posts: 6
Joined: Thu Dec 09, 2010 2:42 pm

Re: Guardian report

Post by gb2010 » Thu Dec 09, 2010 2:56 pm

Make sure there is NO Contact Order granted at Court if this is applicable to your case. Kind regards.

Post Reply

Who is online

In total there is 1 user online :: 0 registered, 0 hidden and 1 guest (based on users active over the past 5 minutes)
Most users ever online was 242 on Sat May 16, 2020 7:47 am